Comparing benchmark scores, pricing, and energy use across open-weight language models and their providers.
Built with GLM-5.2 on Neuralwatt · 1.60 kWh · 193.7 g CO₂ · Data: Artificial Analysis · models.dev · Neuralwatt · OpenRouter · generated 2026-10-03 09:40 UTC
Blended cost = (7·cache + 2·input + 1·output)/10. When a provider omits cache-hit pricing, the input price is used as an upper bound (cache hits are never more expensive than a regular input token). 47 models shown: open-weight (via models.dev), with an Agentic Index score AND input + output pricing. Models without input or output pricing are excluded. Energy per request (16k–64k band) is measured (solid dots) for 7 models with a Neuralwatt match, and estimated as k × blended cost (hollow dots) for the remaining 36 — see the Neuralwatt calibration below.
Calibration view: measured energy per request (mWh, 16k–64k band, scraped from the
Neuralwatt portal) against NW blended cost per 1M
tokens = (7·cache + 2·input + 1·output)/10 (USD). Dashed line: proportional fit
energy = k × cost through the origin, fitted on base models only (excluding -fast / -short variants);
this k is used to estimate energy for the models without a Neuralwatt match in the comparison chart above.
Hover any dot for details.
Providers offering at least one of the 47 open-weight models above, with count of those models. Click for docs.